COMPARE // XI VS CONVERT

Convert tests the page.
Xi captures the contract.

Convert.com is a privacy-first on-page A/B testing tool, popular with mid-market CRO teams that need GDPR-compliant testing without an enterprise contract. Xi works above the page: the marketing experiment as a contract, across any channel, with no script and no SDK.

エージェント向け MCP · 無制限アーカイブ · カード不要
WHY_SWITCH //

Why teams switch from Convert to Xi

Convert is a thoughtful CRO tool — privacy-conscious, well-documented, fairly priced for mid-market teams. The thing it does well is page-variant testing on web traffic. If most of your experiments are not page variants — and for many marketing teams they are not — you are paying for testing infrastructure you do not use.

  • The contract is the unit, not the page. A pricing test, an outbound sequence, a content cadence — none of these fit a page-variant tool. Xi treats them as contracts: hypothesis, metric, kill threshold, end date.
  • Zero on-page footprint. No JS snippet, no consent flag, no flicker, no perf hit. Privacy-first by absence rather than by configuration.
  • A free plan that does not tier you out. Convert offers a 15-day trial; Xi offers an unlimited free plan with no card.
  • The agent runs it. Claude or Cursor can commit experiments via the Xi MCP server, log values on a cadence, and confirm verdict against the threshold.

If your testing budget is mostly web pages, Convert is a fine choice. If it is not, switch.

THE_BREAKDOWN // dimension by dimension

2 つのツールが本当に違うのはどこか。

次元
Xi
Convert
Unit of work
A contract (hypothesis, metric, kill threshold, end date)
A page variant tested against control with on-page analytics
Scope
Any channel: paid, content, outbound, pricing, onboarding, habits
Web pages, mostly
Setup
Write the contract. No script, no SDK
Install the Convert snippet, build variants in the visual editor
Decision rule
Pre-committed kill and success thresholds, time-bound
Statistical significance on the page variant
Agent / MCP
Remote MCP server. Your agent runs the contract
No native MCP. APIs and integrations
Free plan
Unlimited experiments, unlimited archive, no card required
15-day trial; paid plans afterward
THE_HONEST_TAKE // not every tool fits every job

それぞれのツールが正解になるとき。

Convert が正解なのは
  • You run on-page A/B tests and need GDPR-compliant cookie behavior out of the box.
  • You want a transparent, privacy-conscious CRO tool with strong documentation and support.
  • Your experiments live on the website and the page is the thing you are optimizing.
  • You want heatmaps, recordings, and tests in the same tool.
Xi が正解なのは
  • Your experiments are not page variants: paid, content, outbound, pricing, onboarding.
  • You want zero script on the page and zero SDK in the codebase.
  • You want one archive that holds every experiment, not a separate dashboard per surface.
  • You want an agent to commit and decide experiments via MCP.
FAQ // the questions buyers actually ask

よくある質問、短い答え。

How is Xi different from A/B testing tools?

A/B testing tools optimize one surface, usually a landing page or email. Xi runs experiments across any channel (paid, content, outbound, pricing, onboarding) by capturing the contract (hypothesis, metric, kill threshold, end date) instead of mounting a JavaScript test on a page.

Can I use Xi alongside Convert?

Yes. Use Convert for the on-page CRO it is built for: hero copy, layout, CTA placement, form variants. Use Xi for the marketing experiments that do not fit a page.

Does Xi handle GDPR and privacy?

Xi has zero presence on your pages — there is nothing to consent to. No cookies set on visitors, no tracking script, no fingerprint. Privacy-first by absence.

Do I need to add a script to my site?

No. Xi has zero presence on your pages. You log values manually, via API, or through the Claude MCP integration.

一つアイデアを取って、 実験に変える。

無料プラン、無制限アーカイブ、カード不要。Claude / Cursor / Codex で 30 秒で見られます。