Kameleoon ships features.
Xi ships verdicts.
Kameleoon is a European enterprise platform: A/B testing on the page, feature flags in the codebase, AI personalization across both. Xi works at a different altitude — the contract behind a marketing experiment, captured once, decided by the rules, archived for reuse.
Why teams switch from Kameleoon to Xi
Kameleoon is built for enterprises shipping features and personalizations at scale: SDK install, flag management, ML targeting, EU data residency. If your experiments are mostly marketing — paid, outbound, pricing, content — Kameleoon is overkill, and the procurement cycle is the wrong shape. Teams move to Xi for four reasons.
- No procurement cycle. Sign up, ship in five minutes. Kameleoon is sales-led; the time-to-first-experiment is measured in weeks.
- One archive across channels. Marketing experiments do not sort cleanly into "feature" or "page" — they are contracts about what you are trying. Xi treats them that way.
- A free plan, not a sales call. Unlimited experiments, unlimited archive, no card.
- The agent runs it. MCP-native, so Claude or Cursor can commit experiments and decide verdicts. Kameleoon has SDKs and APIs but no native MCP.
If you are an enterprise running feature rollouts at scale, keep Kameleoon. If you are a marketing team running cross-channel experiments, switch.
Where the two tools actually differ.
When each tool is the right call.
- You are an enterprise with a product engineering team that owns the experimentation stack.
- You need feature flags + A/B testing + AI personalization in one tool, with EU data residency.
- Your experiments are mostly product-side: feature rollouts, in-app variants, personalization.
- You need governance, SSO, and dedicated CSM support across a large org.
- You are a marketing team without an engineer in the loop.
- You want a single contract per experiment, a single verdict, and an archive you can reuse.
- You want the agent to commit and confirm experiments via MCP.
- You do not need flags. You need a way to decide.
Common questions, short answers.
How is Xi different from full-stack experimentation platforms?
Full-stack platforms are product-first: feature flags, SDKs, statistical engines tied to your application. Xi is marketing-first: a single contract per experiment, a verdict at the end, and an archive you can reuse. No flags, no SDK in your codebase.
Can I use Xi alongside Kameleoon?
Yes. Use Kameleoon for in-app feature flags and personalization where they are the right fit. Use Xi for the marketing experiments and the contract layer that records what you decided across channels.
Does Xi have AI personalization?
No, intentionally. Xi captures the contract — hypothesis, metric, threshold, verdict. Personalization belongs in a tool built for it.
Do I need to install an SDK?
No. Xi has zero codebase footprint. You write the contract in plain language and log values manually or via the Claude MCP integration.
Take one idea. Turn it into an experiment.
Free plan, unlimited archive, no card required. See it in Claude / Cursor / Codex in 30 seconds.